quote:

Lexington

Ship of fools
Nov 13th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Political parties die from the head down

JOHN STUART MILL once dismissed the British Conservative Party as the stupid party. Today the Conservative Party is run by Oxford-educated high-fliers who have been busy reinventing conservatism for a new era. As Lexington sees it, the title of the “stupid party” now belongs to the Tories’ transatlantic cousins, the Republicans.

There are any number of reasons for the Republican Party’s defeat on November 4th. But high on the list is the fact that the party lost the battle for brains. Barack Obama won college graduates by two points, a group that George Bush won by six points four years ago. He won voters with postgraduate degrees by 18 points. And he won voters with a household income of more than $200,000—many of whom will get thumped by his tax increases—by six points. John McCain did best among uneducated voters in Appalachia and the South.

The Republicans lost the battle of ideas even more comprehensively than they lost the battle for educated votes, marching into the election armed with nothing more than slogans. Energy? Just drill, baby, drill. Global warming? Crack a joke about Ozone Al. Immigration? Send the bums home. Torture and Guantánamo? Wear a T-shirt saying you would rather be water-boarding. Ha ha. During the primary debates, three out of ten Republican candidates admitted that they did not believe in evolution.

The Republican Party’s divorce from the intelligentsia has been a while in the making. The born-again Mr Bush preferred listening to his “heart” rather than his “head”. He also filled the government with incompetent toadies like Michael “heck-of-a-job” Brown, who bungled the response to Hurricane Katrina. Mr McCain, once the chattering classes’ favourite Republican, refused to grapple with the intricacies of the financial meltdown, preferring instead to look for cartoonish villains. And in a desperate attempt to serve boob bait to Bubba, he appointed Sarah Palin to his ticket, a woman who took five years to get a degree in journalism, and who was apparently unaware of some of the most rudimentary facts about international politics.

Republicanism’s anti-intellectual turn is devastating for its future. The party’s electoral success from 1980 onwards was driven by its ability to link brains with brawn. The conservative intelligentsia not only helped to craft a message that resonated with working-class Democrats, a message that emphasised entrepreneurialism, law and order, and American pride. It also provided the party with a sweeping policy agenda. The party’s loss of brains leaves it rudderless, without a compelling agenda.

This is happening at a time when the American population is becoming more educated. More than a quarter of Americans now have university degrees. Twenty per cent of households earn more than $100,000 a year, up from 16% in 1996. Mark Penn, a Democratic pollster, notes that 69% call themselves “professionals”. McKinsey, a management consultancy, argues that the number of jobs requiring “tacit” intellectual skills has increased three times as fast as employment in general. The Republican Party’s current “redneck strategy” will leave it appealing to a shrinking and backward-looking portion of the electorate.

Why is this happening? One reason is that conservative brawn has lost patience with brains of all kinds, conservative or liberal. Many conservatives—particularly lower-income ones—are consumed with elemental fury about everything from immigration to liberal do-gooders. They take their opinions from talk-radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and the deeply unsubtle Sean Hannity. And they regard Mrs Palin’s apparent ignorance not as a problem but as a badge of honour.

Another reason is the degeneracy of the conservative intelligentsia itself, a modern-day version of the 1970s liberals it arose to do battle with: trapped in an ideological cocoon, defined by its outer fringes, ruled by dynasties and incapable of adjusting to a changed world. The movement has little to say about today’s pressing problems, such as global warming and the debacle in Iraq, and expends too much of its energy on xenophobia, homophobia and opposing stem-cell research.

Conservative intellectuals are also engaged in their own version of what Julian Benda dubbed la trahison des clercs, the treason of the learned. They have fallen into constructing cartoon images of “real Americans”, with their “volkish” wisdom and charming habit of dropping their “g”s. Mrs Palin was invented as a national political force by Beltway journalists from the Weekly Standard and the National Review who met her when they were on luxury cruises around Alaska, and then noisily championed her cause.

Time for reflection

How likely is it that the Republican Party will come to its senses? There are glimmers of hope. Business conservatives worry that the party has lost the business vote. Moderates complain that the Republicans are becoming the party of “white-trash pride”. Anonymous McCain aides complain that Mrs Palin was a campaign-destroying “whack job”. One of the most encouraging signs is the support for giving the chairmanship of the Republican Party to John Sununu, a sensible and clever man who has the added advantage of coming from the north-east (he lost his New Hampshire Senate seat on November 4th).

But the odds in favour of an imminent renaissance look long. Many conservatives continue to think they lost because they were not conservative or populist enough—Mr McCain, after all, was an amnesty-loving green who refused to make an issue out of Mr Obama’s associations with Jeremiah Wright. Richard Weaver, one of the founders of modern conservatism, once wrote a book entitled “Ideas have Consequences”; unfortunately, too many Republicans are still refusing to acknowledge that idiocy has consequences, too.

quote:

Barack Obama won college graduates by two points, a group that George Bush won by six points four years ago

quote:

Bush is smarter than McCain?

quote:

Moderates complain that the Republicans are becoming the party of “white-trash pride”.

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

Bush is smarter than McCain?

No, doofus. After 8 years of Bush, college graduates now support the Democrats.

quote:

a group that George Bush won by six points four years ago

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

Bush is smarter than McCain?

No, doofus. After 8 years of Bush, college graduates now support the Democrats.

Welcome to the AR Political Forum!!!!! Where we have been providing LOW COST, LOW QUALITY Entertainment for the Unemployed and Retired Complainers of the World, on a 24 hour a Day Basis, AT NO COST TO YOU... Since 1998!!!!!

Life Member: The American Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Jan 20, 2009.. Prisoner in Dumocrat 'Occupied America', Partisan in the 'Save America' Underground


Beavis..... James Beavis..... Of Her Majesty's Secret Service..... Agent 00.7

Jerry Jeff Walker: " He's 34 and livin in a HONKY TONK...Just kicking hippies asses and raising hell."

"Posterity — you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
John Quincy Adams

A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him "Why do you carry a 45?" The Ranger responded, "Because they don't make a 46."

quote:

8 years?

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

8 years?

What, you think that because college graduates voted for Bush four years ago, that means he wasn't President before then? You're just full of faulty logic tonight.

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

8 years?

What, you think that because college graduates voted for Bush four years ago, that means he wasn't President before then? You're just full of faulty logic tonight.

quote:

Originally posted by Gator1:

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

8 years?

What, you think that because college graduates voted for Bush four years ago, that means he wasn't President before then? You're just full of faulty logic tonight.

Info

The original story was 4 years ago Bush got 6% more of the College Educated vote than Kerry.

Now McCain gets 2% less of the College vote the Obama.

It doesn't say how much of the College vote Bush got 8 years ago.

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

Bush is smarter than McCain?

No, doofus. After 8 years of Bush, college graduates now support the Democrats.

quote:

So what you're trying to say iSponge is that the book learned, no real life experience, liberal, social climber wannabees are now leaning to Obama?

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

8 years?

What, you think that because college graduates voted for Bush four years ago, that means he wasn't President before then? You're just full of faulty logic tonight.

quote:

What percentage did they vote for him in 2000?

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

What percentage did they vote for him in 2000?

I don't care.

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

So what you're trying to say iSponge is that the book learned, no real life experience, liberal, social climber wannabees are now leaning to Obama?

Wow! What college did you attend?

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

So what you're trying to say iSponge is that the book learned, no real life experience, liberal, social climber wannabees are now leaning to Obama?

Wow! What college did you attend?

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

What percentage did they vote for him in 2000?

I don't care.

quote:

Originally posted by Heat:

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

So what you're trying to say iSponge is that the book learned, no real life experience, liberal, social climber wannabees are now leaning to Obama?

Wow! What college did you attend?

Several actually iSponge. MIT, Berkely (waaaay to liberal for me) and a hand full of others while I was in the military. You?

Ken....

quote:

Originally posted by 6BR:

quote:

Originally posted by Heat:

quote:

Originally posted by InfoSponge:

quote:

So what you're trying to say iSponge is that the book learned, no real life experience, liberal, social climber wannabees are now leaning to Obama?

Wow! What college did you attend?

Several actually iSponge. MIT, Berkely (waaaay to liberal for me) and a hand full of others while I was in the military. You?

Ken....

I apologize for my post then. I didn't realize you were one of those "book learned" people with no life experience.