Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I just acquired an Winchester 1917 Enfield rifle in very good condition. It has a poorly done sporterized stock on it that will be going away. It is also fitted nicely with a fully adjustable rear peep sight stamped "Pacific". I have read in a few places on this forum that this action will handle a full length magnum case. I would like to turn this into a magnum length perhaps .375 H&H. Any info would be greatly appreciated. | ||
|
one of us |
People have gone as big as 505 Gibbs with the 1917 Enfield. 375 H&H should be pretty straightforward. You can make it a simple working gun or make it a work of art. Look for Butch Lambert's 416 Rigby Enfield custom. Anyone who doesn't like that one needs to find a new hobby. | |||
|
One of Us |
Just looked up Butch Lambert's gun, Wow! what a piece of work. Am I to understand the enfield action will take the magnum length without being opened up? | |||
|
one of us |
It will need some work to feed a bigger round. I have to confess...I'm not the person to ask about that. I don't have the knowledge you need. There are some great gunsmiths on this site, however. They may see this thread and answer your questions. If they don't see it soon, maybe post a new thread with a title about what is required to modify a 1917 for 375 H&H. | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks, I understand. I expect to open rails etc. to help with feeding. I was only wondering about the actual length of the action. The action had little appeal to me until I saw what some folks have done with it. | |||
|
one of us |
Yeah. I have a not quite finished custom in 338-378 KT. The action has been opened up enough to hold a full length 378 Weatherby and 338 Lapua. If you want, I can send pics comparing it to a (mostly) factory 1917, but that will be later tonight at best. | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks for the offer but do not bother yourself. I am sure I can find it with a little research. I picked this gun up for little or nothing and am now surprised to find out I have a lot of options. Getting a little excited. I try to have a custom in the works at all times, takes a couple of years from beginning to end. I just got back my .264 Win Mag on a 98 BRNO action and am awaiting the stock work to be completed. I will take a little time to research out what I can do with the enfield. Open to any suggestions and thanks for all the input. | |||
|
One of Us |
tim, I have an Enfield that sounds very close to what you have, Pacific sight included. The only difference is mine is a Remington, originally made in 1918. I got mine for free. I have tossed around the idea of making a budget .404 Jeffery out of mine. Dennis Olson is I'm told a good person to talk to. They can be made into some pretty Big bigbores. Do check out Butch Lambert's Enfield. It's one of the prettiest customs I've ever seen. http://forums.accuratereloadin...1019521/m/8291057671 Roger ___________________________ I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along. *we band of 45-70ers* | |||
|
One of Us |
I have not been able to find anything about the Pacific sights. | |||
|
One of Us |
Tim: Pm coming. George "Gun Control is NOT about Guns' "It's about Control!!" Join the NRA today!" LM: NRA, DAV, George L. Dwight | |||
|
One of Us |
The only thing I've found on Pacific sights is what's for sale in eBay. I need the original side screw for mine. I like it and would like to leave it on with a little restoration work. Roger ___________________________ I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along. *we band of 45-70ers* | |||
|
One of Us |
I agree. I will be keeping this site. It is well made and look good on the gun | |||
|
One of Us |
Decision has been made. I am turning this into a 9.3x62 bush gun. Keeping the peep sights, 20 inch barrel and synthetic stock. Thoughts? | |||
|
One of Us |
Yes, any P14 or 17 is best made into a 375 length magnum; as it was originally designed for; the 276 Enfield. I have done several in 375. A brush gun, to me, should be short and light; the Enfield is not a small action. Anything less is a waste of a good action and 9.3x62s can be made on any action. I use P14 bolts as they are already the right size with no bolt face or extractor mods needed. New mag box of course. OTOH, it is yours and you can do what you want with it of course. | |||
|
One of Us |
A friend of mine had a Win 17 that was rebarrelled to a wildcat .375/404 Improved. I don't know what/if any alterations were done to the rails, but it worked flawlessly and was a real powerhouse. | |||
|
One of Us |
Nothing a ball end mill and a few minutes won't solve. It ain't rocket surgery. | |||
|
One of Us |
As dpcd pointed out. the 17 is a heavier action than the 98. I am curious what the real difference in weight is when the wings are milled of etc. between the 98 and the 17. I would not imagine more than a few ounces? | |||
|
One of Us |
I can answer that; the 1917 is 35 ounces, ears removed. 98 Mauser is 30.5 , so 5.5 ounces difference. No bottom metal. But the length potential for the 375 is the important difference. | |||
|
one of us |
I was fortunate to acquire three Remington Model 30S which is virtually the same action. One is still 30-06, one is 400 H&H and I had the third re-bored to 9.3 x 62. It came with a Lyman hunting peep original to the rifle and I had that one re-bored to keep the gun looking period. That caliber is a very easy conversion. The 400 H&H turned out to be a great round but I'm still dealing with feeding issues (minor). All three are in re-stocking prison at the moment but I am very happy with that action. Hogkiller has a matched pair a few serial numbers apart in 375 and 458 Lott that are stunning. I bet you'll love yours when you get it back. "Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson. | |||
|
One of Us |
Where is hogkiller? I thought somebody said he passed away. Been several years since I have seen him. | |||
|
one of us |
I haven't spoken with him in a bout a year or longer. I know his vision was going from the diabetes; hopefully that is the only reason for his absence. "Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson. | |||
|
One of Us |
Yeah, I hope that he is doing OK. | |||
|
One of Us |
I have a Winchester 1917 I am working with now in 416/404 Jeffery. Also have two Remington 30s Express actions that need to be made into something, or find a new home! been thinking of doing a 30-378?? | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks for this info. It is more of a weight difference than I would have thought. | |||
|
One of Us |
I am curious if anyone on here has had a 1917 rebored to 35 Whelen? I hear the old Military barrels can be a problem when trying to do this. | |||
|
One of Us |
I've never heard that? It was pretty common long ago for people to rebore old .30-06's into .35 Whelens. I'm sure a truckload of military rifles were done up this way back then. Roger ___________________________ I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along. *we band of 45-70ers* | |||
|
One of Us |
I have read, but have no first hand knowledge of it, that the early barrels can have hard spots in them which turn up during reboring and cause problems. Those barrels were forged to upset the breech end, then machined. Remember, that was early in alloy steel making technology (nickel steel). Probably rare. | |||
|
One of Us |
Classic re-boreing claims a 50/50 chance of a good turn out on old Military Barrels. The Bore on Mine isn't the best, so I might give it a try sometime. | |||
|
One of Us |
Having built several 375 H&H and 416 Rigby rifles on P-14 and Model 1917 Enfield actions I'll just say they are great for those long cartridges but, I much prefer 98 Mausers for 30-06 length cartridges. It's hard to find semi inleted stocks and scope bases for the Enfield action making the costs much higher for stock work. | |||
|
One of Us |
I have one in .375 H+H +love it. It is considerably heavier than my Whitworth however.That being said;for any treks of distance I prefer a light rifle;recoil be damned;you will carry it more than you will shoot it.Of course you always carry your own rifle or as Selous said "opportunities will be missed." Never mistake motion for action. | |||
|
One of Us |
I just picked up a nice Remington with the ears already milled off. Might be a good candidate for something big. What force or guile could not subdue, Thro' many warlike ages, Is wrought now by a coward few, For hireling traitor's wages. | |||
|
One of Us |
My first .375 H&H was a converted Winchester built M17. It was hardly recognisable by most folks as a M17. Opened up to .375, 26" barrel, straightened the floorplate/magazine (4 + 1), duckpond in rear bridge filled, single staged trigger, cock on opening, speedlocked, restocked. Later it wore a 1 3/4 x 5 Tasco in Conetrol (?) rings, front sling swivel on barrel (not band). It was about 9 1/2 lbs. Very accurate. Should I do it again. I would straighten the bolt handle and put the safety on the bolt shroud...........just to tidy up the area of the stock around the safety. Loved the factory safety though. | |||
|
one of us |
From my personal experience as a customer sometimes re-boring is supposed to be a crap shoot. I have never had a failed job but I have sent in barrels that were risky. The first barrel I ever re-bored was a Sauer 200 hammer forged barrel I sent to Cliff LaBounty. He warned me that it was probably work hardened from the forging process like SAKO barrels and would likely be a failure due to chatter (270 to 338). It was toast in the bore and I had nothing to lose but $165.00 so I asked him to try. I got the barrel back bored and chambered in 338-05 Ackley with a note that it "cut like butter". Since then Dan Pedersen bored a Rem Model 30S from 308 to 9.3 with no issues. The Model 30 came out whole lot later that the M-1917 Enfield but that doesn't mean the barrels were new production. I also had a 19th century Marlin 38-40 bored to 44-40 and if metallurgy sucked in the early 1900s imagine what it was in the late 1800s. Only one anecdotal story, but I think the risks are much smaller that the facts. If I were in that business I would be extraordinarily careful to inform my clients of the risk too, but so does Walgreens when they give you a flu shoot. | |||
|
one of us |
Ive built a number of big bores on the Win. rifles, both milsurp and the Factory model..My long throated .338, my 404 Jefferys, a 416 Rigby and 416 Rem...Its a great action, and I even really like that old ugly hammer safety on a DG rifle ts easy to find and manipulate..They need a lot of work, but so does a 98 Mauser.. you can buy a Douglas barrel for about a $160 bucks retail from Brownell..If I was going to spend some money on a nice .375 I would use a new barrel. However your rifle is a factory Win 1917 and its not a military barrel so rebore will work just fine.. Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120 rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com | |||
|
One of Us |
There is no question about the suitability of the enfield action for such rounds as the .375 H&H. Properly done, they can be spectacular rifles...cock on opening, Timney trigger, sprucy looking bolt handle, straightened floorplate speedlock conversion (often required after cock on opening is done), new barrel, ears removed and nicely sculptured rear ring,magzine lengthened, feed rails altered,and the list goes on. Put it n a nicely checkered European walnut stock and you'll have as very beautiful and functional dangerous gme rifle.....CRF too f you like. That said, after all the work is done and PAID for......you'll have substantially more invested in it than if you purchased a new Winchester M-70 African.....or the Alaskan whichI prefer. One more thing.....if the need arises, you'll get a much better resale value from the Winchester than from the beautiful Enfield...and the Winchester will weigh less too. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
I have a .35 Whelen on a model 98 action. Simply sent it to ER Shaw for rebarreling and bluing. One of my favorites. | |||
|
one of us |
unless you have a Win. factory Enfield (1917) I would opt for a new barrel, The Winchester comm. rifle is OK to rebore, but for the difference Id use a Douglas barrel, they are very reasonably priced at Brownells...If I was building a high dollar Enfield Id opt for a Lothar Walthar barrel..and I wouldn't waste that Win action on a smaller caliber Id go big, big, big like a 416 Rigby or 505 Gibbs or that kind of big.. Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120 rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia