The Accurate Reloading Forums
Friction vs. Smooth bore

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3221043/m/5141005162

31 August 2020, 03:20
ar corey
Friction vs. Smooth bore
Does the friction induce much wasted energy in terms of having to cut the grooves of the bullet? Would not a 3 groove rifled barrel quicker than say a 5 groove rifling?
31 August 2020, 06:37
dpcd
No, but having no rifling at all definitely makes for higher velocities. It is not the number of grooves that matters; the friction is very low, once the projectile is engraved. What takes all the energy is the very act of spinning the bullet. Two groove Springfield barrels have the same performance as 4.
One of the reasons our M256 120mm Tank Cannon is smooth bore and gets close to 5000 fps. Projectiles are fin stabilized, and for HEAT rounds, you do not want them to spin anyway. It disrupts the jet when it hits.
31 August 2020, 07:37
cal pappas
Greener stated in his book a smooth bore was as accurate as a rifled bore to 60 yards. In addition, all things being equal (bullet weight and powder charge) a smooth bore would have higher velocity and less recoil; both due to the projectile not having to cut into the rifling. I've had smooth bores in 12 & 8 bore and accuracy was fine at the 50 yard targets at my home range.
C


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
03 September 2020, 21:19
Lamar
when your talking about friction your talking about surface area.
cutting the engraving is something different, I'd call it distortion.

either way they are different forces.

anyhow.
you have to look at the total surface area affected.
12 very shallow lands and grooves.
5 rounded over or ratcheted lands.
4 square cut lands.
or three triangle shaped lands.

right.
all of them have surface area and all of them have to displace metal.
it's the total amount of metal moved and total amount of surface to surface contact your concerned with.