THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Handgun Hunting    Which stainless revolver .357 trail gun?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Which stainless revolver .357 trail gun?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Looking at smaller framed revolvers with 3 to 5 inch barrels.

Ruger SP101 4 inch, Smith 3" Model 60 or Model 60 Pro, or Smith 4.25" Model 66 (though maybe bigger than I want).

Any thoughts?

Any others I ought to consider?
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Ruger SP101 4 inch


This I been tempted to add one to my handgun tool box for awhile.
 
Posts: 19314 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kyler Hamann
posted Hide Post
I've played quite a bit with a 60 Pro. Really accurate, really small, great trigger.

Normally I want a bit more horsepower than a .357, but if you want a smaller .357 it's hard to go wrong with a 60 Pro.


___________________________
www.boaring.com
___________________________
 
Posts: 2503 | Location: Central Coast of CA | Registered: 10 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
X2 but then I always have been a S+W fan.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Buglemintoday
posted Hide Post
Can't go wrong with a Ruger. I have been very pleased with mine.


"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
 
Posts: 3315 | Location: Permian Basin | Registered: 16 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
The SP101 is built like a small tank. When in the business, I spoke with numerous ranchers and horse folks who just made sure one was handy to settle virtually all eventualities.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16306 | Location: Sweetwater, TX | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you run a full octane 357 in any of these small 357, 180 grains 1400 fps out of a 6 inch barrel, you are going to have a bucking horse to hold down.

I had a 357 sp101 with 2 inch barrel. Built like a tank, but with decent 357 mag lids it still was hell to hold. The lighter and smaller Smith’s must be worse.

Out of those options take the Ruger. If you are only going to be shooting 38 special then it does not matter.

Oh, and do not just shoot 38s and carry real 357s. You want to be proficient and accustomed to the stuff you are betting on. Accuracy at intended ranges is not an issue. It is the difference in how the firearms reacts to the magnum and recoil you get that is vast difference.
 
Posts: 10608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The 66 is to big for what you need a revolver for. I own both the SP101 and the S&W 60 Pro. Pretty sure the SP is heavier. I don't concern myself with the argument the Ruger will last longer. Been shooting both brands since the middle 1970's and to this date never had to send either back to the factory for being out of time, etc.
Rugers are notorious for mediocre to bad triggers out of the box. S&W's are just the opposite.
My opinion is go with the Pro. It might be a shade more money upfront but you are going to have to spend cash on upgrading the Ruger at some point if you like a precise trigger.

Have you considered the S&W 69 in 44 mag? Its a compact 5 shot. And if you reload pretty easy to load it down.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6591 | Location: Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think I want a 4" barrel for shooting dynamics and velocity potential. And sight plane. Any thoughts on this? They made the Smith J frame in 5" at one point, didn't they?

Trying to get significantly lighter than my Mountain Gun. Plus I just really like the look and feel of the small frame revolvers.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To be clear on my point, it is not a strength issue with the Smiths. I do not shoot that much. The issue is light guns and sear, wrist torquing recoil.

The only thing worse is my 454 Casuall.

4 inch barrel has to be better than the 2 inch I had. Simply, gets the blast a little further away.

They did make a five inch J frame in the single digit 2000s, maybe before that.
 
Posts: 10608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
SP101 and Model 60 are about 1/4 pound different for weight (23.2 for 3" Smith, 23.4 oz for 3" Smith Pro, to 27 oz for 3" Ruger and 29oz for 4.2" Ruger). There's a 1/2 to 3/4 pound step up to the K frame (36.9 oz for 4.25" model 66).

I was surprised that the L frame 44 (model 69) is within an ounce (37.4 oz) of the K frame. I think my tapered barrel Model 29 mountain gun is 43.5 oz.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of rnovi
posted Hide Post
I have an SP101 with a 3" barrel and it's wonderful choice, even with heavy 180gr. loads.


Regards,

Robert

******************************
H4350! It stays crunchy in milk longer!
 
Posts: 2309 | Location: Greater Nashville, TN | Registered: 23 June 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Rnovi, any idea of the velocity you get with the 180's and 3 inch barrel?

S&W guys, any thoughts on the model 60 pro vs the plain vanilla model 60? Slightly prefer the round barrel contour, but like the wood grip and night sights on the 60 pro.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
What is a trail gun? Is it something to fend off big bad animals? Finish off wounded animals? Kill small game? If I wanted to shoot accurately I would want something with adjustable sights, but generally these only come with barrels of 4" or so. Is this still a trail gun? Will it be holstered or just stuffed in a back pack?
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10505 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
In the early 70s, I backpacked a lot in the Big Bend area. For a trail gun, I carried a Charter Arms Bulldog in 44 spl. at that time the most knockdown with the least weight.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of rnovi
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skl1:
Rnovi, any idea of the velocity you get with the 180's and 3 inch barrel?

S&W guys, any thoughts on the model 60 pro vs the plain vanilla model 60? Slightly prefer the round barrel contour, but like the wood grip and night sights on the 60 pro.


Honesty, I have no idea. I never clocked them.

I ran them in my 6" GP100 and rang 200 yard steel with them for fun. Out of giggles I decided to try them with the 3" SP101. Snappy! Rang 2 out of 6 shots at 200 - that was a hoot!

https://www.buffalobore.com/in...product_detail&p=100

BuffaloBore claim 1300 fps in a 3" S&W...something tells me that's a little optimistic.


Regards,

Robert

******************************
H4350! It stays crunchy in milk longer!
 
Posts: 2309 | Location: Greater Nashville, TN | Registered: 23 June 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Peter, I'm looking for a small-framed revolver with a barrel 3-5". Probably stainless. Probably in .357.

I called it a trail gun because I want it smaller and lighter. I might bring it instead of a bigger pistol for pig hunting in Texas to finish pigs that crawl into the brush. Might also carry it backpacking. I've got a .44 Mountain Gun or 10mm Glock I'd likely carry if I went into Grizzly country. But I really like small frame revolvers. I think they're versatile, especially in .357. It's not for concealed carry. I'd like a longer or heavier barrel for sight plane, velocity, handling/shooting dynamics. I love the looks, size, and weight of the 3" fixed sights SP101, but I'm leaning towards adjustable sights like on the S&W model 60 or SP101 4" model.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rnovi:
quote:
Originally posted by skl1:
Rnovi, any idea of the velocity you get with the 180's and 3 inch barrel?

S&W guys, any thoughts on the model 60 pro vs the plain vanilla model 60? Slightly prefer the round barrel contour, but like the wood grip and night sights on the 60 pro.


Honesty, I have no idea. I never clocked them.

I ran them in my 6" GP100 and rang 200 yard steel with them for fun. Out of giggles I decided to try them with the 3" SP101. Snappy! Rang 2 out of 6 shots at 200 - that was a hoot!

https://www.buffalobore.com/in...product_detail&p=100

BuffaloBore claim 1300 fps in a 3" S&W...something tells me that's a little optimistic.


Thanks, rnovi. Even if it's 200 fps optimistic it's better than I expected.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Take a look at the guns listed by First Stop Guns on Guns America. They have a like new gun I think would be perfect.

S&W model 60-18 stainless 357. It is a five shot with a 4&7/8 inch barrel. It appears as new.
 
Posts: 3073 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: 11 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks all. LJS, looked at Guns America. Couldn't find the First Stop Guns one you mentioned filtering for their S&W's, but did find -18's.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
The 66 is to big for what you need a revolver for. I own both the SP101 and the S&W 60 Pro. Pretty sure the SP is heavier. I don't concern myself with the argument the Ruger will last longer. Been shooting both brands since the middle 1970's and to this date never had to send either back to the factory for being out of time, etc.
Rugers are notorious for mediocre to bad triggers out of the box. S&W's are just the opposite.
My opinion is go with the Pro. It might be a shade more money upfront but you are going to have to spend cash on upgrading the Ruger at some point if you like a precise trigger.

Have you considered the S&W 69 in 44 mag? Its a compact 5 shot. And if you reload pretty easy to load it down.


Hmm, a model 66 is too big yet the even larger M29 is ok?

I love the 44 Mag and agree with loading it down but the N frame surely isn't small compared to a K frame.

The SP's are nice. My Favorite carrying .357 is an older 4" SS Security Six. Accurate as can be, relatively light.




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4857 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
He does mean the Model 69 44 mag. It is the L frame 44 mag.
 
Posts: 10608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Rugers are notorious for mediocre to bad triggers out of the box. S&W's are just the opposite.


Ruger triggers have gotten a lot better and it has been a long since S@W have been know for great triggers out of the box.

Both can be fixed Rugers being easier to work on.
 
Posts: 19314 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by z1r:
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
The 66 is to big for what you need a revolver for. I own both the SP101 and the S&W 60 Pro. Pretty sure the SP is heavier. I don't concern myself with the argument the Ruger will last longer. Been shooting both brands since the middle 1970's and to this date never had to send either back to the factory for being out of time, etc.
Rugers are notorious for mediocre to bad triggers out of the box. S&W's are just the opposite.
My opinion is go with the Pro. It might be a shade more money upfront but you are going to have to spend cash on upgrading the Ruger at some point if you like a precise trigger.

Have you considered the S&W 69 in 44 mag? Its a compact 5 shot. And if you reload pretty easy to load it down.


Hmm, a model 66 is too big yet the even larger M29 is ok?

I love the 44 Mag and agree with loading it down but the N frame surely isn't small compared to a K frame.

The SP's are nice. My Favorite carrying .357 is an older 4" SS Security Six. Accurate as can be, relatively light.


Never said M29. I said 69, pay attention buckwheat


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6591 | Location: Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Ski 1, I just checked on TexasGunTrader.com in the Austin locale + there is a guy with an S/S Ruger 357 w/ 3.5" bbl. 1981 mfg. that he wants to trade for an S+W model 60. He probably would go for cash as well. Want me to get a phone # for you?


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
I pulled it back just for grins. It is a security six w/ adjustable sights, looks in really good shape. Has a 2.75" bbl. He would be interested in trading for other compact revolvers, not just S+W. His posted # is 361-765-8720. Hope this helps


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
It is a security six w/ adjustable sights


A security six would make a great trail gun.

But like a model 19 a bit bigger then the OP wants.
 
Posts: 19314 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Smith and Wesson model 65 in three inch. Perfect gun for your needs. Small enough for concealed carry but heavy enough to handle full 357 mag loads. They are hard to find but only because they are so sought after.
 
Posts: 886 | Registered: 25 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Oh well, it never hurts to try to help out.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My local guy didn't have either in stock. I ordered a Smith Model 60 Pro Series. Not in love with the look of the slab sided barrel, but I like tritium front sight and the wood grip. And theoretically the trigger has been worked.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Maryland | Registered: 17 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skl1:
My local guy didn't have either in stock. I ordered a Smith Model 60 Pro Series. Not in love with the look of the slab sided barrel, but I like tritium front sight and the wood grip. And theoretically the trigger has been worked.


You will like it. They are a classy looking revolver with a really good trigger pull.
Congratulations


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6591 | Location: Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I selected a S&W Model 686+ (7 shot) for a trail gun. 3" barrel. A bit bigger than what you wanted.
 
Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I also carry a S&W Model 60 Pro Series and really like it. I have a Model 60-4 that is older, and is a .38 Special with 3" barrel and adjustable sights. The .38 seems to be a little more accurate than the .357 also. Sometimes I carry a Model 63 in .22 with a 4" barrel. They are all great guns and are not too heavy.
 
Posts: 772 | Registered: 03 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a Smith M60 in .357 with a 5" BBL. I carry it just about all the time over my big frame guns.One of my favorites.
 
Posts: 206 | Location: North Alabama | Registered: 13 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think the ideal 357 all around gun is the K frame round but SS Model 65 with three inch barrel, IF you can find one. Accurate, powerful, easily concealed when needed.
 
Posts: 886 | Registered: 25 February 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hikerbum
posted Hide Post
I got one....hheeee heee. Might sell it. But it will cost you. Box, papers, everything. Almost mint. Perfect size carry gun.

quote:
Originally posted by clayman216:
I think the ideal 357 all around gun is the K frame round but SS Model 65 with three inch barrel, IF you can find one. Accurate, powerful, easily concealed when needed.


Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
 
Posts: 2576 | Location: Western New York | Registered: 30 December 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skl1:
Looking at smaller framed revolvers with 3 to 5 inch barrels.




The new Colt King Cobra is a fairly small framed 6 shot. By looks it seems a little smaller than a K frame.


Dumb, dumber, democrat
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: 08 November 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I’m old and so is my “trail gun”... like z1r, I carry a stainless Ruger Service-Six. That’s the fixed sight version of the Security Six. It been my favorite for close to 30 years.


Shoot Safe,
Mike

NRA Endowment Member
www.Marionroad.com
www.mausercentral.net
 
Posts: 934 | Location: Middle Georgia | Registered: 06 February 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
Does anyone but me carry a single action? How about a stainless vaquero in 357?
 
Posts: 5691 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
I have a Keith # 5 in 44 mag. that I'm comfortable carrying. I find the single-action feature to be much more accurate.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Handgun Hunting    Which stainless revolver .357 trail gun?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia