THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM OPTICS FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Retro fitting reticle on Leupold 1.5 - 5X
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have a Vari-X 3 Leupold 1.5-5 scope with the standard duplex reticle. I would like to use i on my DG rifle, but would prefer the German #4 style reticle - like the one my S&B 2- 10 has. Is this something that Leupold might do for me?
 
Posts: 872 | Location: S. E. Arizona | Registered: 01 February 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
I don't know whether they would want to but, if nothing else, it should be easy to get at as most of the guts in an image-movement scope come out with the erector tube.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cougarz
posted Hide Post
Yes they absolutely will do it. That's just one of the great services Leupold offers.


Roger
___________________________
I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along.

*we band of 45-70ers*
 
Posts: 2786 | Location: Washington (wetside) | Registered: 08 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Checked with leupold... here's the message that they sent me...

quote:
Thank you for your interest in the Leupold Custom Shop. At this time we are in the process of restructuring the Custom Shop in order to refine and improve our services. As a result, we are not accepting any new custom scope or retrofit orders at this time. To keep up to date with the status of the Leupold Custom Shop, please visit https://www.leupold.com/servic...ort/custom-shop-temp and sign up.
 
Posts: 872 | Location: S. E. Arizona | Registered: 01 February 2019Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That message sounds ominous.

Leupold has been drifting further and further into mass marketing and putting much more of their working capital into marketing and advertising than into research, development, and product service. Some shit-eating bean-counter has determined that the net return-on-investment of the custom shop is lower than investing in copy writers for ad slicks, so they are likely closing that service down to maximize short term corporate profits. Don't be surprised if their famous lifetime warranty quietly goes away to be replaced by some kind of Madison Avenue promise of "ever better products and services".
 
Posts: 13214 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of mdvjrp93
posted Hide Post
When I talk to them they said it would reopen around the first of the year. That was in early December. I guess that we will have to wait and see. I hope Stonecreek is wrong???


1 shot 1 thrill
 
Posts: 340 | Location: South Carolina | Registered: 14 December 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cougarz
posted Hide Post
Yikes! I hope they do reopen their custom shop. It would be a sad day indeed if they didn't. But unfortunately many good companies have backed away from services they once provided.

I still have a coupon for a custom turret for one of my scopes I haven't used yet.


Roger
___________________________
I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along.

*we band of 45-70ers*
 
Posts: 2786 | Location: Washington (wetside) | Registered: 08 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
That message sounds ominous.

Leupold has been drifting further and further into mass marketing and putting much more of their working capital into marketing and advertising than into research, development, and product service. Some shit-eating bean-counter has determined that the net return-on-investment of the custom shop is lower than investing in copy writers for ad slicks, so they are likely closing that service down to maximize short term corporate profits. Don't be surprised if their famous lifetime warranty quietly goes away to be replaced by some kind of Madison Avenue promise of "ever better products and services".


Just as government bureaucracies lurch between building and slashing, the manufacturing world swings from offering more and better products to cutting costs and inventories. If Stonecreek is right, it might be heading for the latter about now.

However, if my suspicions about the fragility of erector tubes and springs are right, they might abandon the lifetime warranty at their peril. I imagine scope makers have large stocks of dead parts in secret storage and live in fear of the market talking about crap products instead of wonderful warranties.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would bet dollars to donuts they are doing that to suit their customers demands, like they have done for many many years, Yes they have moved to the scopes that are in demand by todays shooters and hunters who think every rifle should have a 1.5 x 40 to cover all the bases!! Roll Eyes Maybe the 3X and the 2.5X Leupold Alaskan will return, at least they are still a special order scope today, but the 4X is available and its the best BG hunting scope ever, I bought a 4X compact for my 250 Savage and am loving it... stir tu2


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 41763 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
If you're talking to Leupold, Ray, suggest they bring out a line based on that special 2.5x they made for you ... or make the Alaskan with the original reticle-movement.

Then, if they bought the licensing to make Burris's Signature rings and inserts, they could offer a package with real integrity and big-game hunters could return to some kind of scope certainty.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
...but the 4X is available and its the best BG hunting scope ever, I bought a 4X compact for my 250 Savage and am loving it... stir tu2


Ray, I have a Leupold M8-4X. nice scope! And I called to confirm custom shop status... they are NOT abandoning the shop - just 're-organizing'.
 
Posts: 872 | Location: S. E. Arizona | Registered: 01 February 2019Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alec Torres:
And I called to confirm custom shop status... they are NOT abandoning the shop - just 're-organizing'.


Of course, that is almost verbatim of what Thompson Center told us about their custom shop a while back. Smiler


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9319 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Last I'd heard that had gone from around $50 to $200 for a reticle change....
 
Posts: 1007 | Registered: 21 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
You'd really need to love the scope to pay $200, zrp, when a basic Leupold might be bought for little more and mounted today. The dearer models do have special erector springs but if you're aware of why that can be important, you'd be chasing an old reticle-movement scope on the Internet.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mike_Dettorre
posted Hide Post
The reticle change fee is about right, I called and was surprised it went from I think $75 to $200.

One-offs in a mfg process are problematic.

Leupold also appears to be rationalizing its product line.

The first rule of any company is to be profitable.

I always laugh at all the "geniuses" who speculate about what companies are doing and why with no actual knowledge of what is going on in a company.


Mike



What I have learned on AR, since 2001:
1. The proper answer to: Where is the best place in town to get a steak dinner? is…You should go to Mel's Diner and get the fried chicken.
2. Big game animals can tell the difference between .015 of an inch in diameter, 15 grains of bullet weight, and 150 fps.
3. There is a difference in the performance of two identical projectiles launched at the same velocity if they came from different cartridges.
4. While a double rifle is the perfect DGR, every 375HH bolt gun needs to be modified to carry at least 5 down.
5. While a floor plate and detachable box magazine both use a mechanical latch, only the floor plate latch is reliable. Disregard the fact that every modern military rifle uses a detachable box magazine.
6. The Remington 700 is unreliable regardless of the fact it is the basis of the USMC M40 sniper rifle for 40+ years with no changes to the receiver or extractor and is the choice of more military and law enforcement sniper units than any other rifle.
7. PF actions are not suitable for a DGR and it is irrelevant that the M1, M14, M16, & AK47 which were designed for hunting men that can shoot back are all PF actions.
8. 95 deg F in Africa is different than 95 deg F in TX or CA and that is why you must worry about ammunition temperature in Africa (even though most safaris take place in winter) but not in TX or in CA.
9. The size of a ding in a gun's finish doesn't matter, what matters is whether it’s a safe ding or not.
10. 1 in a row is a trend, 2 in a row is statistically significant, and 3 in a row is an irrefutable fact.
11. Never buy a WSM or RCM cartridge for a safari rifle or your go to rifle in the USA because if they lose your ammo you can't find replacement ammo but don't worry 280 Rem, 338-06, 35 Whelen, and all Weatherby cartridges abound in Africa and back country stores.
12. A well hit animal can run 75 yds. in the open and suddenly drop with no initial blood trail, but the one I shot from 200 yds. away that ran 10 yds. and disappeared into a thicket and was not found was lost because the bullet penciled thru. I am 100% certain of this even though I have no physical evidence.
13. A 300 Win Mag is a 500 yard elk cartridge but a 308 Win is not a 300 yard elk cartridge even though the same bullet is travelling at the same velocity at those respective distances.
 
Posts: 10043 | Location: Loving retirement in Boise, ID | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Dettorre:
...I always laugh at all the "geniuses" who speculate about what companies are doing and why with no actual knowledge of what is going on in a company.


Yes, and without cutting up scopes to see how they work, we can only trust or not trust them. By the time any particular model develops a reputation the maker supersedes it with something else that may or may not be better or even as good.

All I know is that until they go back to erector sets lodged firmly in the outer tube, there has to be two or three ounces of crap lurching around whenever a heavy calibre is touched off - unless perhaps a third 'screw' something like the Burris Posi-Lock is employed.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sambarman338:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Dettorre:
...I always laugh at all the "geniuses" who speculate about what companies are doing and why with no actual knowledge of what is going on in a company.


Yes, and without cutting up scopes to see how they work, we can only trust or not trust them. By the time any particular model develops a reputation the maker supersedes it with something else that may or may not be better or even as good.

All I know is that until they go back to erector sets lodged firmly in the outer tube, there has to be two or three ounces of crap lurching around whenever a heavy calibre is touched off - unless perhaps a third 'screw' something like the Burris Posi-Lock is
employed.


I own a number of Leupold scopes and I have never had a failure. My 1.5-5X has been good for me. I plan on putting it on thE .404J that is being built for me. No need to buy a new scope when I have one that I like already.
 
Posts: 872 | Location: S. E. Arizona | Registered: 01 February 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
I guess it depends how much you intend to shoot that .404, Alec. Ray Atkinson (see above) is one of our long-experienced members. He thinks the real trouble starts with the 458 Lott, and prefers small fixed-power Leupolds on the larger calibres. He has found some of their variables start to rattle within five packets of ammo on the .458-plus calibres, but I would not feel confident just because mine was one step down.

Leupold finally got so sick of him sending back scopes for repair they made him a special 2.5x that was still going after about 1500 shots on really big rifles.

Ray said Leupold claimed it would not fail because the reticle was under the turrets. Though a first-focal-plane, image-movement scope* would fit that bill, putting the reticle there could make the erector-tube even more front-heavy and prone to damage. Therefore, I can only infer that they made him something like the reticle-movement scopes they sold before 1964.


* One that provides a constantly centred reticle, usually by articulating the whole erector set/power scroll and reticle, assembled in a tube hinged at the back and held against the turret screws by one or more springs. Pecar, however, achieved this by leaving the erector set fixed firmly in the outer tube and simply put a restrictive field stop around the old FFP reticle, the only bit that moved when knobs were turned. This made the reticle always look centred but worked by restricting the field of view - and presumably added some tunnel vision. It may be the latter is what Leupold did with Ray's scope.
 
Posts: 4915 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have no idea, they explained it to me in medical terms that no normal man can understand..

The scope I got is a 2.5X Leupold compact, to my knowledge off the shelf, but it has held up for a number of years now unless I sold it..Ihave several and don't even know which one it is or was now, dammit!!...Life just got to complicated I guess..

I like my Leupold Alaskan, 3Xs and 4Xs better than any varible scopes I have and the Alaskan is on my 375 right now, but it bounces around from gun to gun..

I just could not give up the centered reticle, too many years of shimming up bases back in the day, NOt sure what Im giving up, but for a hunting gun, its working well enough as it holds its zero and the rifles have given up nothing to those one inch or better that I require these days..

BTW I have a swift and a Bushnell Banner that have the non centered cross hairs. If anyone is interested in both Id give them the deal of the year! tu2


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 41763 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia